Economic problems have become a severe aspect of the healthcare system that affects patient care, the organization and its work environment, and the community’s overall well-being. I will focus either on the healthcare financial issue of the insufficiently qualified personnel or on the implications of such a problem among the different communities, especially the deserving ones (Veenstra & Gautun, 2020). Turning to one’s own experiences, values, and evidence, the paper emphasizes how important it is to find a solution to the problem of insufficient healthcare personnel compared to the demand to ensure that all citizens have equal access to quality medical care.
Rural health access is one key issue currently facing the healthcare economy. Many rural residents need more availability of medical care. The statistics show that about 57 million Americans are rural residents, and the rural area’s health resources are less likely than the urban areas (Coughlin et al., 2019). This puts into brackets the few primary care physicians, specialists, and general healthcare services required as primary. Compared to people living in cities, residents in rural areas have difficulty accessing medical care immediately. Thus, patients could have late diagnoses, severe conditions, and poor health status. Such studies revealed that for a bulk of people living in rural areas, more cases of chronic diseases were reported, for example, heart disease and diabetes, and this is partly caused by the reduced access to preventive care and some health education programs (Coughlin et al., 2019). This issue also has economic consequences. No treated illnesses support overall healthcare costs and hamper the financial output of rural communities in the long term. The rural-urban difference in healthcare access is necessary to improve rural residents’ health and well-being.
This healthcare management problem was selected because it is driven by personal experience and a strong desire for a better patient care outcome. Every single period of my professional healthcare activity, I see the adverse consequences of understaffed staffing on patients’ safe and high-quality care. Virtual healthcare internships are a window to real-world concerns, as the exposure brought to the forefront nature of this common problem of work overload persists, driving personnel to continuous exhaustion, burn, and additional burdens to their patients. We are all aware that a responsible healthcare provider upholding standards of ethics and ensuring patients’ well-being is the primary mission. However, more staff in healthcare is needed to ensure the mission at the heart of healthcare delivery.
Personal principles are central to the failure to solve this issue. The most crucial matter is the fundamental right of every person to take part in healthcare services without being affected by external factors, like the lack of personnel. Staff shortages in care delivery, patient safety, and health disparity are hampered, as well as worsening health inequalities, particularly in vulnerable populations (Flaubert et al., 2021). These imbalances contradict the ideals of justice, equal opportunity, and fairness; therefore, ethical healthcare dictates them.
The economic issues that console inside inadequate staffing should not be treated light-mindedly. Alongside patient care, staffing deficits also add up to costs of operations, inefficiencies of the organizations, and workforce attrition (Kelly et al., 2020). The financial burdens of healthcare organizations are only the tip of the iceberg, and the remaining implications of society can be observed in less productive communities and compromised public health outcomes.
The healthcare economic problem of inadequate staffing has been a prominent factor that affects the way organizations, colleagues, and communities are exposed to the higher risk of diseases or other healthcare problems, especially in low socio-economic groups. In our workload, understaffing has become the source of intensified workload, increased stress, and unfavorable attitudes, eventually prevailing among healthcare professionals. The bias disrupts our ability to meet benchmarks of healthcare delivery and makes job burnout and job dissatisfaction possible, leading to our detriment.
Dealing with staff insufficiency inside the organization affects working functions, leading to inefficiencies in patient flow. Hence, wait times are longer as patient outcomes are compromised. The economic payoff from handling understaffing is remembered as overtime pay and recruitment costs that strain organizational re
Struggling with online classes or exams? Get expert help to ace your coursework, assignments, and tests stress-free!